Welcome to citizendium. At last, a web encyclopaedia that is fair and unbiased and which does not operate under the twisted logic of wikipedia.
At wikipedia, you can be banned from participating if you are an expert on a subject, even if that subject is your own entry, because you are accused of having a “conflict of interest”!
At wikipedia, you can edit under an atavar so that no one needs to know who you are. Thus, you can get away with all sorts of wickedness and play all sorts of silly games.
At citizendium, you have to register under your real name, and you have to prove that this is your real name!
Larry Sanger has launched citizendium to counter the bias that is threatening to destroy the good name that wikipedia DID HAVE, but is rapidly loosing due to all this foolishness. It is a sad fact that wikipedia entries can no longer be trusted because of hidden agendas put into effect by people who dare not tell you who they are!! I wonder if the nameless ones who destroy particular wikipedia entries got in and name a catastrophe of Larry Sanger’s entry, if he would be able to edit his own entry due to a “conflict of interest”?
With thanks to Homeopathy 4 Everyone – The Hpathy Ezine
It is with great regret that Wikipedia has been exposed as deeply prejudiced against Alternative Medicine, such that the homeopathic community has now established its own version, www.wiki4cam.org, to counter the subversive propaganda Wikipedia is pumping out. Shame on them!
Do you know how Wikipedia, the world’s most used encyclopedia defines ‘Homeopathy’? Read this:
- Claims to the efficacy of homeopathic treatment beyond the placebo effect are unsupported by the collective weight of scientific and clinical evidence, although advocates of homeopathy point to studies of the effects of compounds diluted almost out of existence.
- Common homeopathic preparations are diluted beyond the point where there is any likelihood that molecules from the original solution are present in the final product; the claim that these treatments still have any pharmacological effect is thus scientifically implausible and violates fundamental principles of science, including the law of mass action.
- Critics also object that the number of high-quality studies that support homeopathy is small, the conclusions are not definitive, and duplication of the results, a key test of scientific validity, has proven problematic at best. The lack of convincing scientific evidence supporting its efficacy and its use of remedies w ithout active ingredients have caused homeopathy to be regarded as pseudoscience; quackery; or, in the words of a 1998 medical review, “placebo therapy at best and quackery at worst.”
Do you know that nearly all Complementary & Alternative Medicine (CAM) articles on Wikipedia, including the one that you practice, are heavily biased against CAM therapies? Everything that does not fall into the realm of modern medicine has been labeled as pseudo-scientific or unscientific at Wikipedia.Wikipedia is among the top 10 websites globally. Through it millions of people who use internet to search for alternative medicine are being systematically exposed to anti-CAM data. At the time when the world is rushing towards alternative medicine, the effort to sabotage the alternative medicine cannot be ignored.To counter this misinformation, we need a place where the CAM community can build its own knowledge base without the undue interference of skeptics. We need a place where the CAM practitioners themselves write articles and create a true picture of its history, development, efficacy and positive research.To ensure that the alternative medicines is not discredited or disputed unfairly and to create a true encyclopedia for Complementary & Alternative Medicine (CAM), Hpathy.com, world’s leading homeopathy portal, is announcing a parallel wiki project at www.wiki4cam.orgPlease visit www.wiki4cam.org now and find out why the CAM community needs to come together and take charge of its own content.