Charles Darwin, who consulted homeopaths himself, said
‘… for at this present moment I care more about Drosera than the origin of all the species in the world. But I will not publish on Drosera till next year, for I am frightened & astounded at my results…
“Is it not curious that a plant shd be far more sensitive to a touch than any nerve in the human body! Yet I am perfectly sure that this is true.” (equivalent to a 7th homeopathic decimal dilution).
Read about more research on other topics
Darwin investigated homeopathic dilutions (1860) and continued his studies on drosera until 1881:
“In this connection I may refer to Darwin’s researches with the fly catching plant, Drosera, or Sundew. Darwin found that solutions of certain salts of ammonia stimulated the glands of the tentacles and caused the latter to turn inwards.
He made this solution more and more dilute, but still the plant was able to detect the presence of salt.
Darwin was almost frightened by his results. Writing to Franciscus Cornelis Donders (1818-1889) he says:
“The 1/4,000,000th of a grain absorbed by a gland clearly makes the tentacle which bears the gland becomes inflected; and I am fully convinced that 1-20,000,000th of a grain of the crystallised salt (i.e., containing about one-third of its weight of water of crystallisation) does the same.
“The leaves are first rate chemists & can distinguish even an incredibly small quantity of any nitrogenised substance from non=nitrogenised substances.”
Darwin abandoned his original intention to publish a short paper on the subject, fearing that his estimate of the astonishing sensitivity of the leaves of these plants to minute quantities of nitrogenous substances would scarcely be believed without further supporting evidence (letter to Edward Cresy, 12 December [1860]).
This work was not published until 1875, when Insectivorous plants appeared. (letters to Charles Lyell, 24 November [1860], and to Daniel Oliver, 20 October [1860]).
“I care more about Drosera than the origin of all the species in the world. But I will not publish on Drosera till next year, for I am frightened & astounded at my results.
“Is it not curious that a plant shd be far more sensitive to a touch than any nerve in the human body! Yet I am perfectly sure that this is true.” (equivalent to a 7th homeopathic decimal dilution).
In 1860, Darwin wrote to the well known physiologist Franciscus Cornelis Donders (1818-1889) of Utrecht Netherlands, that he observed 1/4,000,000th of a grain of the salt had a demonstrable effect on Drosera.
Now I am quite unhappy at the thought of having to publish such a statement.
The reader will best realise this degree of dilution by remembering that 5,000 ounces would more than fill a thirty one gallon cask or barrel and that to this large body of water one grain of the salt was added – only half a drachm or thirty minims of the solution poured over the leaf. Yet this amount sufficed to cause the inflection of the leaf.
In fact, every time that we perceive an odour, we have evidence that infinitely smaller particles act on our nerves. Moreover, this extreme sensitiveness, exceeding that of the most delicate part of the human body, as well as the power of committing various impulses from one part of the leaf to another, have been acquired without the intervention of any nervous system.”
It is not surprising that homeopaths were amongst the first people to embrace Darwin’s Origins of Species and to write to him to share their ideas and offer him support.
Read about more homeopathic research on other topics
#1 by Bob Griggs on June 12, 2009 - 12:31 pm
Quote
This report provides an accurate summary of Darwin’s text comments. His experiments were carefully conducted and showed the great sensitivity of Drosera to ammonium salts.He was very surprised by his results. I refer the careful reader to the table provided in his book “Insectivorous Plants”,chapter VII, in the section headed “General summary and concluding remarks on salts of ammonia”. This tables shows that Darwin established both a no-effect-level and a rudimentary dose-response. His results are therefore indistinguishable from standard medical theory.
#2 by Dana Ullman, MPH on March 10, 2010 - 2:16 am
Quote
For people who want more information about Charles Darwin, his experiences with homeopathy and with the above Drosera work, I wrote an article in a peer-review journal published by Oxford University Press:
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fafterburn.burningman.com%2F09&h=cb3b57c2fef5311b26bf407bc22c6096
#3 by JP on April 20, 2011 - 9:44 am
Quote
Charles Darwin has really done lots of wonders in our world. His contributions have been quite useful and will still be useful for the years to come. It is a relief that there are lots of people who salute him.
#4 by Ian Jones on August 19, 2011 - 3:23 pm
Quote
Thanks for the interesting article; this really sheds new light on homoeopathy and has certainly made me consider the subject more carefully. I feel that it is a branch of medicine often dismissed as somewhat wishy washy or unscientific. The fact that Darwin deemed it more valuable than this common perception will doubtless work to change public opinion. It’s fascinating when old research emerges and can still be used to supplement and enrich today’s knowledge. It serves as a real reminder of how little knowledge we currently possess and points to areas which have not yet been fully explored. Hopefully this will encourage more research into homoeopathy and a fuller understanding of the subject.