<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles Darwin Proved Homeopathic Dilutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avilian.co.uk/2009/03/charles-darwin-proved-homeopathic-dilutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avilian.co.uk/2009/03/charles-darwin-proved-homeopathic-dilutions/</link>
	<description>A site about Homeopathy, Healing, Diet, History and so much more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Jones</title>
		<link>http://avilian.co.uk/2009/03/charles-darwin-proved-homeopathic-dilutions/comment-page-1/#comment-4695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avilian.co.uk/?p=1027#comment-4695</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interesting article; this really sheds new light on homoeopathy and has certainly made me consider the subject more carefully. I feel that it is a branch of medicine often dismissed as somewhat wishy washy or unscientific. The fact that Darwin deemed it more valuable than this common perception will doubtless work to change public opinion. It&#039;s fascinating when old research emerges and can still be used to supplement and enrich today&#039;s knowledge. It serves as a real reminder of how little knowledge we currently possess and points to areas which have not yet been fully explored. Hopefully this will encourage more research into homoeopathy and a fuller understanding of the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting article; this really sheds new light on homoeopathy and has certainly made me consider the subject more carefully. I feel that it is a branch of medicine often dismissed as somewhat wishy washy or unscientific. The fact that Darwin deemed it more valuable than this common perception will doubtless work to change public opinion. It&#8217;s fascinating when old research emerges and can still be used to supplement and enrich today&#8217;s knowledge. It serves as a real reminder of how little knowledge we currently possess and points to areas which have not yet been fully explored. Hopefully this will encourage more research into homoeopathy and a fuller understanding of the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://avilian.co.uk/2009/03/charles-darwin-proved-homeopathic-dilutions/comment-page-1/#comment-4243</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avilian.co.uk/?p=1027#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>Charles Darwin has really done lots of wonders in our world. His contributions have been quite useful and will still be useful for the years to come. It is a relief that there are lots of people who salute him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Darwin has really done lots of wonders in our world. His contributions have been quite useful and will still be useful for the years to come. It is a relief that there are lots of people who salute him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Ullman, MPH</title>
		<link>http://avilian.co.uk/2009/03/charles-darwin-proved-homeopathic-dilutions/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Ullman, MPH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avilian.co.uk/?p=1027#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>For people who want more information about Charles Darwin, his experiences with homeopathy and with the above Drosera work, I wrote an article in a peer-review journal published by Oxford University Press:

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fafterburn.burningman.com%2F09&amp;h=cb3b57c2fef5311b26bf407bc22c6096</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For people who want more information about Charles Darwin, his experiences with homeopathy and with the above Drosera work, I wrote an article in a peer-review journal published by Oxford University Press:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fafterburn.burningman.com%2F09&#038;h=cb3b57c2fef5311b26bf407bc22c6096" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fafterburn.burningman.com%2F09&#038;h=cb3b57c2fef5311b26bf407bc22c6096</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Griggs</title>
		<link>http://avilian.co.uk/2009/03/charles-darwin-proved-homeopathic-dilutions/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Griggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avilian.co.uk/?p=1027#comment-956</guid>
		<description>This report provides an accurate summary of Darwin&#039;s text comments. His experiments were carefully conducted and showed the great sensitivity of Drosera to ammonium salts.He was very surprised by his results. I refer the careful reader to the table provided in his book &quot;Insectivorous Plants&quot;,chapter VII, in the section headed &quot;General summary and concluding remarks on salts of ammonia&quot;. This tables shows that Darwin established both a no-effect-level and a rudimentary dose-response. His results are therefore indistinguishable from standard medical theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This report provides an accurate summary of Darwin&#8217;s text comments. His experiments were carefully conducted and showed the great sensitivity of Drosera to ammonium salts.He was very surprised by his results. I refer the careful reader to the table provided in his book &#8220;Insectivorous Plants&#8221;,chapter VII, in the section headed &#8220;General summary and concluding remarks on salts of ammonia&#8221;. This tables shows that Darwin established both a no-effect-level and a rudimentary dose-response. His results are therefore indistinguishable from standard medical theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

